• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The Adoption Law Firm

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster Parent Adoption & Legal Support
    • Private Adoption
    • Step-Parent Adoption
    • Grand-Parent and Relative Adoptions
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster Parent Adoption & Legal Support
    • Private Adoption
    • Step-Parent Adoption
    • Grand-Parent and Relative Adoptions
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact

The First Question the Court Must Ask

August 28, 2023 //  by Sam McLure

When the service of process on the defendant is contested as being improper or invalid, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that service of process was performed correctly or legally.

The first question a court must ask, in every time and place, is: “Do I have the power to decide this case?” I.e., “Does the Court have jurisdiction?”

In the Juvenile Court System, there are several prerequisites that must be present before the court obtains jurisdiction to decide a case. This article focuses on one of the most commonly used arguments by defense attorneys – that the court does not have power to decide the case because the legal parents have not been correctly or legally served.

In the case of M.W. v. Calhoun DHR, 2210093 (Ala. Civ. App. June 30, 2022), the Court of Civil Appeals (Civs) effectively reversed the Juvenile Court’s order granting Termination of Parental Rights. The Civs did not even reach the merits of the case before ruling that the Juvenile Court’s order was void.

What does that mean? What does it mean that the Civs ruled the Juvenile Court’s order is “void?” I find that the best way to understand the concept of a void judgment is to think of the expanse of space explored by the Starship Enterprise. It launches into the nothingness of the void. There’s nothing there. Never was and never will be.

Black’s Law Dictionary takes a slightly more scholarly approach when it defines a void judgement as having  “no legal effect” and by implication, void ab initio “void from the beginning.”

The Court in M.W. explained that perfected service of the legal parent is necessary for the Juvenile Court to obtain personal jurisdiction. If that doesn’t happen, it’s game over. Okay, we all have that. Here’s where things get really interesting:

When the service of process on the defendant is contested as being improper or invalid, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that service of process was performed correctly or legally.

Burden shifting is a big deal. Think of it this way. Two people are walking up 30 flights of stairs. There’s one bag of bricks that has to make it to the top. Who is going to carry the bag of bricks? Oh yeah, you’re going to get in a fist fight with each other when you get to the top.

You definitely want the other person to carry the bag of bricks don’t you?

To make the Petitioner carry the bag of bricks, all the defendant has to do (or their attorney) is whisper a challenge to the propriety of personal service. After this initial contest to the validity of service, the Petitioner (either DHR or the Foster Parent) carries the burden of proof (the bag of bricks) to prove that service of process was performed “correctly or legally.”

Thus, it’s incumbent upon the Petitioner, whether DHR or the Foster Parent, to ensure that the legal parents have been properly served – well before the TPR trial.

P.S. The unscrupulous defense counsel may erroneously argue to the court that service of process has not been correct and legal because the legal parent might not have received a copy of the court’s recent order setting the hearing. This is a snipe hunt. After the legal parents have been served with the initial summons, and that parent is represented by counsel, the legal parent is not entitled to be served with any other notices, pleadings, motions, or orders:

Ala.R.Juv.P.13(A)(1) “After…a termination-of-parental-rights petition has been filed, summonses shall be issued to and personally served by a process server…upon…the parent or parents.”

Rule 13(A)(4) “The service of the summonses shall give the juvenile court jurisdictionover the persons served.”

Rule 14 “Retained counsel…or appointed counsel…shall receive copies of all notices, pleadings, motions, orders, and other documents required by statute or rule to be given to parties, and, in these cases, notices need not be given and pleadings, motions, orders, and other documents need not be made available…to the parties unless the juvenile court shall so order.”

 

Previous Post: « How to Write a Proposed Order – Brevity is Best
Next Post: Foster Parents Must Engage in the TPR Trial »

Primary Sidebar

Quick Adoption Links

  • How to Write a Letter of Reference for an Adoption Home Study
  • Paying for Adoption
  • What is an Adoption Home Study?
  • What is the Monetary Cost of Adoption?
  • When Does an Internationally Adopted Child Become a US Citizen?

Recent Posts

  • 5 Tips for Foster Parent Advocacy
  • Welcoming Ben DuPré to The Adoption Law Firm
  • H.K. v. D.D.: A Private Termination of Parental Rghts Action
  • If Your Adoption is Transferred to the Juvenile Court, What’s Next?
  • Can Foster Parents Be Awarded Visitation After Removal

Receive Our Free
Email Newsletter

Signup Now!

“Sam McLure fights for adoptions with all his heart.  It’s not just his profession, but his passion.”
– Travis & Cheri Norwood

Footer

The Adoption Law Firm

The Adoption Law Firm is specifically focused on domestic and international adoptions.  We are located in Alabama and proudly serve the surrounding region.   Learn More . . .

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone

Testimonial

“We found The Adoption Law Firm to be knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful.  Sam helped us finalize our third adoption.  It was handled professionally and efficiently.  I love that there is a law firm that is committed not only professionally, but personally to adoption.” – Michael & Bonnie Eaves

Contact Us

P.O. Box 231538
Montgomery, AL 36123
334.546.2009

www.TheAdoptionFirm.com ·
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.