• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The Adoption Law Firm

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster Parent Adoption & Legal Support
    • Private Adoption
    • Step-Parent Adoption
    • Grand-Parent and Relative Adoptions
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster Parent Adoption & Legal Support
    • Private Adoption
    • Step-Parent Adoption
    • Grand-Parent and Relative Adoptions
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
Joseph, Heidi, and Tate Bayly (Charlie Nye/Genesis)

Has a Juvenile Court Intake Officer Ever Refused to Accept Your Dependency Petition

November 16, 2023 //  by Sam McLure

The Administrative Office of Courts (AOC) provides frequent training for every county’s Juvenile-Court Intake Officer (JCIO). As hard as AOC tries, their is inevitably some variance in the application of that training across Alabama’s 67 counties.

A JCIO plays an important role in the community. Much like the role that a Magistrate plays in criminal law, the JCIO must ensure that the petition has probable cause before presenting it to the court. The JCIO is essentially the filter for improper claims of dependency. This is arguably more important than the Magistrate because, once the court finds that a child is dependent, the court can make almost any ruling it wants, so long as the ruling is loosely connected to the child’s best interest.

If you find yourself  in the parking lot of the Juvenile Court, with your dependency petition in hand, without a date stamp, what remedies are at your disposal to redress this injustice?

In M.S. and D.S. v. Calhoun County DHR, CL-2023-0223 (Ala. Civ. App. October 20, 2023), the Court of Civil Appeals explained that

the proper avenue to challenge the alleged refusal of a juvenile-court intake office to accept a dependency petition is the filing of a petition for the write of mandamus with this court within 14 day.

There you have it. If a JCIO, or any clerk for that matter, wrongfully refuses to accept your pleadings, the proper remedy is a writ of mandamus.

Previous Post: « Alabama’s New Adoption Code – Effective January 1, 2023
Next Post: Alabama’s New Adoption Code – Probate Court’s Power to Adjudicate Paternity »

Primary Sidebar

Quick Adoption Links

  • How to Write a Letter of Reference for an Adoption Home Study
  • Paying for Adoption
  • What is an Adoption Home Study?
  • What is the Monetary Cost of Adoption?
  • When Does an Internationally Adopted Child Become a US Citizen?

Recent Posts

  • H.K. v. D.D.: A Private Termination of Parental Rghts Action
  • If Your Adoption is Transferred to the Juvenile Court, What’s Next?
  • Can Foster Parents Be Awarded Visitation After Removal
  • Tears of Joy in a Courtroom
  • Mother and Daughter: Official At Last!

Receive Our Free
Email Newsletter

Signup Now!

“Sam McLure fights for adoptions with all his heart.  It’s not just his profession, but his passion.”
– Travis & Cheri Norwood

Footer

The Adoption Law Firm

The Adoption Law Firm is specifically focused on domestic and international adoptions.  We are located in Alabama and proudly serve the surrounding region.   Learn More . . .

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone

Testimonial

“We found The Adoption Law Firm to be knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful.  Sam helped us finalize our third adoption.  It was handled professionally and efficiently.  I love that there is a law firm that is committed not only professionally, but personally to adoption.” – Michael & Bonnie Eaves

Contact Us

P.O. Box 231538
Montgomery, AL 36123
334.546.2009

www.TheAdoptionFirm.com ·
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.