• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The Adoption Law Firm

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster-Care Adoption
    • Birth-Mother Adoption
    • Private Adoption
    • Stepparent/Grandparent Adoption
    • Embryo Adoption
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster-Care Adoption
    • Birth-Mother Adoption
    • Private Adoption
    • Stepparent/Grandparent Adoption
    • Embryo Adoption
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact

Alabama Supreme Court, Justice Stuart on Alabama’s Child-Protection System

October 16, 2013 //  by Sam McLure

Justice StuartSome children find themselves in the foster care system through no fault of their own.  They are the victims of abuse and neglect.  When biological parents are found to be an unfit option to provide for the care and nurture of these children, the Juvenile Court must decide whether to terminate this child’s ties to their biological family; i.e., Termination of Parental Rights (TPR).

Part of the Juvenile Court’s analysis in deciding whether TPR is the appropriate decision is a factor known as “no-viable-alternative.”  The no-viable-alternative prong requires DHR to expend themselves looking for a blood relative who could be a suitable caregiver to the child.

Alabama Supreme Court Justice, Justice Stuart isn’t fond of this prong and, like all good authors, she clearly articulates what may have previously been a murky feeling:

“[Our current case law] suggests that the Department of Human Resources, before filing a termination-of-parental-rights petition, must prove any viable relative resource, no matter how long a child has been in foster care and, in my opinion, no matter how beneficial a child’s proposed permanent placement.  With such an interpretation of the ‘no viable alternative’ prong of the test, the Court seems to have overlooked the ‘best interest of the child’ and mistakenly placed ‘family reunification’ in a position superior to ‘permanency for the child’ as a consideration in child-welfare cases.  I assert that ‘family reunification’ and ‘permanency for the child’ stand on equal footing as considerations in child-welfare cases and that ‘the best interest of the child’ must always be paramount in cases involving child custody. (underline emphasis added)

 

“[In many situations] only the termination of parental rights and adoption promotes the best interest of the child and provides the permanence desperately needed by a child who, through no fault of his or her own, is placed into our foster-care system.

 

“So long as our child-protection system does not promote the best interest of our children, concerned parties with the best interest of the children at heart will continue to turn to the probate courts of our State in appropriate cases.” (underline emphasis added)

A.M.P., 997 So.2d 1008, 1024 (Ala. 2008)

Well said, Justice Stuart … well said.

Previous Post: « Happy Adoption Day!
Next Post: You Might Want to Drink from This Spigot »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. David Sharp

    October 18, 2013 at 5:36 am

    I agree with this line if thought. Not only does the status quo not serve the best interest if dependent children, it also turns many good foster families away from helping them.

Primary Sidebar

Quick Adoption Links

  • How to Write a Letter of Reference for an Adoption Home Study
  • Paying for Adoption
  • What is an Adoption Home Study?
  • What is the Monetary Cost of Adoption?
  • When Does an Internationally Adopted Child Become a US Citizen?

Recent Posts

  • Weak and Working: Reflections from a Foster Mother
  • Equipping Foster Parents for Gracious Advocacy Series, Part I
  • Introducing Surrogacy: The Legal Ins and Outs
  • Introducing Associate Attorney Morgan Broyles
  • Passion for Adoption Featured in The Alabama Lawyer

Receive Our Free
Email Newsletter

Signup Now!

“Sam McLure fights for adoptions with all his heart.  It’s not just his profession, but his passion.”
– Travis & Cheri Norwood

Footer

The Adoption Law Firm

The Adoption Law Firm is specifically focused on domestic and international adoptions.  We are located in Alabama and proudly serve the surrounding region.   Learn More . . .

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone

Testimonial

“We found The Adoption Law Firm to be knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful.  Sam helped us finalize our third adoption.  It was handled professionally and efficiently.  I love that there is a law firm that is committed not only professionally, but personally to adoption.” – Michael & Bonnie Eaves

Contact Us

P.O. Box 640667
Pike Road, AL 36064
334.546.2009

www.TheAdoptionFirm.com ·
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.