• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The Adoption Law Firm

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster-Care Adoption
    • Birth-Mother Adoption
    • Private Adoption
    • Stepparent/Grandparent Adoption
    • Embryo Adoption
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Resources
  • Domestic
    • Overview
    • Foster-Care Adoption
    • Birth-Mother Adoption
    • Private Adoption
    • Stepparent/Grandparent Adoption
    • Embryo Adoption
  • International
    • Overview
    • Hague Country Adoption
    • Non-Hague Country Adoption
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact

Circuit Court or Juvenile Court: Which has Control, and Why It Matters A.M. v. A.K., Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, September 18, 2020

January 4, 2021 //  by Sam McLure

As a general rule, if a circuit court decides custody in a divorce proceeding, it retains jurisdiction over child custody matters until the child reaches the age of majority.1 However, juvenile courts assume exclusive jurisdiction over the question of child custody when there is a dispute between a parent and a third party as to the dependency of the child. The distinction between dependency and child-custody questions seems easy enough. But, in application, unwary persons coming to circuit court can be caught off-guard.

Under the Alabama Code, “a juvenile court exercises exclusive, original jurisdiction of juvenile court proceedings in which a child is alleged . . . to be dependent.”2 The Court of Civil Appeals recently decided that persons coming to circuit court need to do more than make sure their filings don’t use the word “dependency.” The substance of their filings must be free of allegations that the child is dependent. Because juvenile court jurisdiction over the dependency question is exclusive, any circuit court judgment will have no value.

The case, A.M v. A.K., was decided in mid-September, 2020. It is a perfect example of how complicated the distinction between a custody petition and a dependency petition can be. There, the circuit court awarded the mother custody of the child in 2007 and granted the child’s father visitation. The child’s mother died in 2016 and the maternal aunt then began caring for the child.

Two years later, in 2018, the aunt went to the circuit court seeking custody of the child. In her complaint, she claimed that the father was unfit to care for the child because he had been convicted and imprisoned in 2008 for committing a felony assault against the child’s mother while the child was present. The father did not attend the trial which occurred in June 2019. In January 2020, the circuit court awarded custody of the child to the maternal aunt.

In March 2020, the father sought to overturn the circuit court’s judgement. He argued that the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to decide the custody of the child. He reasoned that the aunt had, in substance, filed a dependency petition and that the juvenile court therefore had exclusive jurisdiction over the custody matter. The circuit court denied the father’s motion.

On appeal, the Court of Civil Appeals agreed with the father. It acknowledged that the aunt’s custody petition in the circuit court was not an express dependency petition on its face. However, the Court reasoned that the aunt had plead that the child was dependent in the substance of her custody petition. A petition that raises the question of the dependency of a child is one that raises issues pertaining to the ability and/or willingness of the legal custodian to care, support, educate, or discharge their other responsibilities to and for the child.3

In A.M. v. A.K., the court held that “in deciding whether a pleading alleges the dependency of a child, . . . the court shall look to the substance of the pleading and not the nomenclature employed by the pleader.”4 Essentially, the court will look not only at the wording of a petition but also the meaning to determine whether the dependency of the child is raised.

By: Rebecca Smith

_____________________________________________________________________

1 S.B. v. P.G.B., 611 So. 2d 293, 394 (Ala. Civ. App. 1992).

2 ALA. CODE 1975 § 12-15-114(a).

3 ALA. CODE 1975 § 12-15-10(8)a.2 and § 12-15-102(8)a.6.

4 M.B. v. R.P., 3 So. 3d 237, 245 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).

Previous Post: « Getting Over Fears About Adoption
Next Post: The Court of Civil Appeals Requires Specific Steps to Challenge a Dependency Finding K.M. v. S.R., Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, November 5, 2020 »

Primary Sidebar

Quick Adoption Links

  • How to Write a Letter of Reference for an Adoption Home Study
  • Paying for Adoption
  • What is an Adoption Home Study?
  • What is the Monetary Cost of Adoption?
  • When Does an Internationally Adopted Child Become a US Citizen?

Recent Posts

  • Weak and Working: Reflections from a Foster Mother
  • Equipping Foster Parents for Gracious Advocacy Series, Part I
  • Introducing Surrogacy: The Legal Ins and Outs
  • Introducing Associate Attorney Morgan Broyles
  • Passion for Adoption Featured in The Alabama Lawyer

Receive Our Free
Email Newsletter

Signup Now!

“Sam McLure fights for adoptions with all his heart.  It’s not just his profession, but his passion.”
– Travis & Cheri Norwood

Footer

The Adoption Law Firm

The Adoption Law Firm is specifically focused on domestic and international adoptions.  We are located in Alabama and proudly serve the surrounding region.   Learn More . . .

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone

Testimonial

“We found The Adoption Law Firm to be knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful.  Sam helped us finalize our third adoption.  It was handled professionally and efficiently.  I love that there is a law firm that is committed not only professionally, but personally to adoption.” – Michael & Bonnie Eaves

Contact Us

P.O. Box 640667
Pike Road, AL 36064
334.546.2009

www.TheAdoptionFirm.com ·
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.